Russian monitors: a compromise between morality and pleasure.

Do you think the monitors of the domestic manufacturer blush from what they show to their users? Don't try to answer. This is a rhetorical question. Of course, if the company has decided to buy a monitor for an office computer, then of course, no one will play toys or watch movies on it during working hours. Or are there some chosen ones among us? Another thing is when a person intends to buy a Russian-made monitor for personal use.

And then you can do whatever your heart desires. The Russian monitor manufacturer is not the Supreme Court. He is unable to influence the morality and artistic preferences of consumers of his products. We hope there are no hypocrites among us! Just a reasonable compromise and a judicial determination are enough so that stories like this do not appear in our society. But so far, as they say, we have.

The other day, the Supreme Court canceled the criminal prosecution of our compatriot. The poor guy was accused of distributing adult films. According to the decision of the Kerch City Court, the Crimean erotomaniac imposed a three-year conditional imprisonment, and even with a probation period. For some reason, I remembered how at the beginning of the "zero" for Hollywood film scores, which are still shown on some fallen channels of the first and second multiplexes, homegrown moviegoers were sent to places not so remote by court decision.

So, our compatriot was severely accused of spreading film consumption. And it doesn't matter whether he viewed these films through Russian PC monitors or did it on bourgeois analogues already accustomed to obscenity. It is important that any Russian who wished to download obscene films to a Russian-made PC or any other device could be in such a delicate situation before this Solomonov decision of the Supreme Court.

And although the lower court by its ruling directly indicated the absence of corpus delicti. The Prosecutor General's Office had the opposite opinion. The argument to the prosecutors seemed reinforced concrete: a torrent client was installed in the personal PC, according to the defendant himself. But the accused himself insisted that he was not going to share the sensitive video and therefore almost immediately deleted it. And indeed, the ill-fated file was not found by the investigation in the seized PC. And only when the court case migrated to the highest judicial body of the country and they did not see the corpus delicti there, the verdict sounded: not guilty!     

For what purposes are we telling all this in detail? We don't want to impose on you: which movies you can watch and which ones you can't. This is purely your taste and moral choice! Let's just remind you that since 2015 in Russia there has been an irreconcilable struggle with narrowly focused network resources aimed at an adult audience. And the first court decision made in one fell swoop covered 136 of them.

Of course, monitors of a domestic manufacturer cannot influence your choice of prohibited content. But the day is not far off when the Russian manufacturer of monitors will integrate the "shame" function into them. And then we will return to the crucial questions again: what is preferable to watch and where to buy a Russian-made monitor.